You could define a level of "accounts that haven't been used at all" that get flagged for "use it or lose it" notifications--which only gets applied in cases where a single person has many many unused accounts. (I want to throw out a number for that, but I'm trying not to think in concrete terms.)
I don't know how hard it would be to establish something like AO3's "Fannish Next of Kin" option, where people can indicate a contact person for decisions where the account holder is unavailable. I'd expect legit RPG uses to not have a problem with "talk to this person if you can't find me," although I'm not involved with journal RPGing and I could be wrong about that. Also, it's possible there are other legitimate many-many-accounts purposes that don't have an obvious second person involved.
But if those problems could be addressed, it's possible that a FNoK could be required (or requested?) to namesquat on a high number of names. It might help in abuse cases too, where there's an accusation of wrongdoing and the account owner is unavailable when the accusation is being made.
no subject
I don't know how hard it would be to establish something like AO3's "Fannish Next of Kin" option, where people can indicate a contact person for decisions where the account holder is unavailable. I'd expect legit RPG uses to not have a problem with "talk to this person if you can't find me," although I'm not involved with journal RPGing and I could be wrong about that. Also, it's possible there are other legitimate many-many-accounts purposes that don't have an obvious second person involved.
But if those problems could be addressed, it's possible that a FNoK could be required (or requested?) to namesquat on a high number of names. It might help in abuse cases too, where there's an accusation of wrongdoing and the account owner is unavailable when the accusation is being made.