denise: Image: Me, facing away from camera, on top of the Castel Sant'Angelo in Rome (Default)
Denise ([staff profile] denise) wrote in [site community profile] dw_biz2009-10-19 04:41 pm
Entry tags:

RFC: Scheduled/Draft Posts; Update page

Scheduled/Draft Posts



Now that we've finished the first draft of site search, our next major project is going to be scheduled/draft posts, which are two separate concepts that we've been bundling together since it'll likely be easiest to do them together:

* The ability to save entries midway through writing them, on our servers, as a draft that you can come back to later from any computer;

* The ability to write an entry and schedule it for posting sometime in the future, either once ("post this next Wednesday at 9PM") or recurring ("post this every Monday at noon").

We have specs for both scheduled posts and draft posts in Bugzilla, but we also wanted to throw it open to the crowd for discussion in case anyone has some awesome ideas we haven't thought of:

* What would you want to see a system like this do?

* What would make you want to use it, and what would be the "killer app" for you?


Update Page



Part of this project is also going to involve redesigning the Update page.

We want to make it possible for you to access your scheduled and draft posts at the time of update, in order to work with them, as well as giving us room to add more options in the future. The existing page doesn't have a lot of leeway for us to add new things, and some of the things we've added since we branched from LiveJournal don't integrate very well.

The resulting Update page after the redesign is likely going to be considerably different than what it is right now. (For instance, I'm tentatively thinking about folding in some of the functions of the Edit Journal Entries page, turning the update page into more of a dashboard, where you can access all of your recent posts -- published and unpublished -- along with your publishing schedule, and then edit or reschedule them, or create a new post -- but that's just a very vague idea.) There's also a lot of things we can do for that page, accessibility-wise, to make it easier for people who use assisitive technology.

We don't want to make things worse from a usability standpoint, though, since writing entries is one of the core functions of the site! Mark has done some statistics about which options are most frequently used while posting, which we'll be taking into account, but I also wanted to ask for thoughts:

* The four most-used options at the time of posting, from our data, are: icon, mood, tags, and crossposting. If you consider something else (other than those four) absolutely critical to how you use the update page, what is it?

* What's one major thing you always wanted to change about the current Update page, and why?

* What are the things you've always liked about the current Update page, and why?

We'll use your opinions to come up with the next iteration of the Update page, which will probably go through several revisions until we come up with something that we (and you!) are satisfied with.
telophase: (Default)

[personal profile] telophase 2009-10-19 09:46 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, good. I was extrapolating from the way LJ does (did?) it. :)
janinedog: (Default)

[personal profile] janinedog 2009-10-19 09:49 pm (UTC)(link)
LJ has always done it this way, too! It's possible that you've missed posts in the past because people set their backdate option on. If you backdate an entry, it won't appear on reading pages, no matter when it was posted.
telophase: (Default)

[personal profile] telophase 2009-10-19 09:51 pm (UTC)(link)
I've missed posts multiple times because they showed up after I read my f-list, sorted into the posts I'd already read. I was assuming it was due to the date/time on the post, but perhaps it was due to server weirdnesses?
foxfirefey: A fox colored like flame over an ornately framed globe (Default)

[personal profile] foxfirefey 2009-10-19 09:53 pm (UTC)(link)
My guess is that your friend had the post private while they were editing it in drafts and then they made it so you could see it when they were done.

Hopefully draft posts will fix that habit for DW!
trobadora: (Default)

[personal profile] trobadora 2009-10-19 10:23 pm (UTC)(link)
This happens frequently on my flist as well; I can't imagine all these posts were made private temporarily ...
branewurms: (Default)

[personal profile] branewurms 2009-10-19 10:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Hmm, same here.
janinedog: (Default)

[personal profile] janinedog 2009-10-19 10:29 pm (UTC)(link)
It's quite possible that LJ's servers' times are not all in sync, which could cause this behavior (since different accounts reside on different machines). I'm not sure how LJ handles server times. That said, I asked Mark, and he said all of DW's servers are always in time sync. So you shouldn't see it happening on DW, hopefully. :)
zarhooie: Girl on a blueberry bramble looking happy. Text: Kat (Default)

[personal profile] zarhooie 2009-10-20 01:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Happens to me a lot. It's annoying.
torachan: (Default)

[personal profile] torachan 2009-10-20 09:08 pm (UTC)(link)
I always assume it's server weirdness. :-/