denise: Image: Me, facing away from camera, on top of the Castel Sant'Angelo in Rome (Default)
Denise ([staff profile] denise) wrote in [site community profile] dw_biz2009-04-11 02:25 am

Paid Accounts

Because we are committed to maintaining a stable, reliable service without ever accepting third-party advertising, we rely on subscription fees from our users to help us meet our operating costs. In exchange for those subscription fees, we offer additional or expanded services and features to our paid users as a way of saying thank-you for subsidizing the service for everyone else. We also reserve the features that cost us money to offer, or that cause significant database or webserver load, for users who have purchased paid accounts.

All of our assumptions, spreadsheets, cost projections, and business plans were done at a 5% paid account rate: each paid account will subsidize 19 free accounts. This applies whether the paid account is for a month or a year. Every payment someone makes will help pay for our servers, our bandwidth, necessary professional services, and the salaries and contractor payments we will be making to those who help develop and run the site.

We project that it will cost us approximately $1.40 a year to support each active user.

Features are reserved for paid contributors for two reasons:
  1. Because offering the feature costs us more than a few cents per user per year;
  2. As a way of saying "thank you" to users who have chosen to support the site, and other users, financially.


This means that some features are reserved for paid users because they're expensive, and some features are reserved for paid users because they're popular. (Sometimes, it's both.) For features that have limits, we offer higher limits to those who choose the Premium Paid account level. This reflects the fact that offering higher levels of these features costs us more money.

As we create new features, we plan on doing it two ways. Some features will be entirely reserved for paid users. Some features will be available to everyone, but significantly enhanced for paid users. We want to strike the right balance between rewarding people who've chosen to subsidize the service for everyone else, and making the service useful and functional for members of all levels.

We know that we likely won't get it completely right on the first try, especially since many of the paid user features on LiveJournal.com aren't available to us to use (either because LiveJournal's implementation of the feature isn't Open Source, because offering that feature would require expensive external partnerships, or because we don't think the implementation LiveJournal chose was the best way of doing it). During our first year of operations, we will constantly examine the paid user features and see what we can add.

Here's a list of the paid user features that will be present at open beta launch (along with why they're a paid user feature). Right now, you can see the Account Levels wiki page; we'll move that information onto the site before we launch to open beta, as we get our payment system finished.

  • Icons: We'll likely be able to raise our icon limits once we see what our usage looks like, but icons are the number one most expensive thing that we offer, because they're stored and used in so many places on the site.
  • Inbox tracking subscriptions: Tracking someone's posts, comments to posts, or other things that can be tracked is resource-intensive; sending email only costs us a couple fractions of a cent, but the real cost is in the processor power necessary to see who's tracking that item and who should get notified.
  • Special subscriptions: We also reserve some subscriptions for paid users only, like being notified when someone posts a poll or when someone in your circle uploads a new userpic. This is a combination of the fact that those subscriptions are computationally expensive and the fact that those subscriptions are nifty.
  • Subscription/access limits: We have to put limits on how many people you can subscribe to or grant access to because building the reading page and determining who's authorized to see which posts is computationally expensive. Paid users get higher limits.
  • Number of tags you can use: We have to put limits on how many tags you can use in your journal because building the tag list and determining what tags each post uses is computationally expensive. Paid users get higher limits.
  • Expand comment threads: Inline expansion of comment threads with the 'expand' link is both computationally expensive and adds to our bandwidth burden, so we reserve it for paid users.
  • Fast Lane: When the site gets overloaded, it can be slow for everyone. We're putting in a function that will let paid users' requests "jump the queue", and be processed before free users' requests. Our goal is to make the site fast for everyone, but when we're having high traffic, that way paid users get to go to the head of the line.
  • Receive forwarded email at @dreamwidth.org: Processing and sending email costs us a couple fractions of a cent, but mostly we reserve this for paid users because it's nifty. (And we do have plans on how to fix up the spam problem.)
  • Mass-change privacy: The function to go back in your journal and set all old entries to a different security level is computationally expensive, so we reserve it for paid users.
  • View your journal entries by security level: The function to view older entries in your journal by security level (so, "all posts to this filter" or "all posts I've made to my access list") is computationally expensive, so we reserve it for paid users.
  • Network page: Building a page of the people who are read by the people you read is computationally expensive, so we reserve it for paid users.
  • Forward your domain to your journal: This feature doesn't cost us much, but we save it for paid users because it's nifty.
  • Post polls: This feature doesn't cost us much, but we save it for paid users because it's nifty.
  • Create mood themes: This feature doesn't cost us much, but we save it for paid users because it's nifty.
  • Receive copies of your own comments in email: This feature doesn't cost us much, but we save it for paid users because it's nifty.
  • Receive text messages through Dreamwidth: This feature doesn't cost us much, but we save it for paid users because it's nifty.
  • Ability to use Google Analytics in your journal: This feature doesn't cost us much, but we save it for paid users because it's nifty.



There are two things that LiveJournal reserves for paid users that we allow every personal account (ie, not OpenID accounts) to do, because we think they're such critical and useful functions of the site that all users should be able to do them. Those things are:

  • Creating syndicated feeds: All users can go to the syndication page and create feed accounts. It costs us money to transfer that data and to run the process that checks for updates, but we thought it was important enough for our ideal of cross-site interoperability to let everyone do it.
  • Directory search: All users can use the Directory to find other users in their area or by interest. It's computationally expensive, but we thought it was important enough for our goal of letting people find other people who make the kind of content they like to read. (Note for closed beta: the directory's currently broken -- that's a bug, and we'll be fixing it before open beta.)



In our first year of operations, we'll be adding a number of features that are either paid-user-specific, or are significantly enhanced for paid users. Right now, the plan includes any or all of the following:

  • Scheduled posts: The ability to write posts ahead of time and have them post at a specified date. All users will be able to use it; paid users will have a higher number of scheduled posts they can queue up. The higher limits will be a paid user feature because it will cost us to store the posts.
  • Draft posts: The ability to write posts ahead of time and save them as drafts, so you can come back and finish them later. All users will be able to use it; paid users will have a higher number of draft posts they can store. The higher limits will be a paid user feature because it will cost us to store the posts.
  • Export journal as .pdf: This will let you save your journal contents as a .pdf file, for both backup and printing. All users will be able to use it; free users will be limited in the number of times they can do it, because it's computationally expensive, while paid users will be able to generate .pdf files more often and with more specific criteria (such as by tag). The higher limits will be a paid user feature because it will be computationally expensive.
  • Expand all comments on page: This will be paid-user only, and will allow people to expand all comments on a single page of comments. It's going to be a paid user feature for the same reason the thread expander is paid-user feature: it's expensive both computationally and bandwidth-wise.
  • Bookmarks views: We're planning on changing 'memories' to 'bookmarks', and making it function much like Delicious does. All users will be able to bookmark things (both publicly and privately) and see others' public bookmarks; paid users will likely be able to see the aggregate public bookmarks of the people on their reading list and the people in their network (those who are read by the people on their reading list). This part of it will be a paid user feature because it will be computationally expensive.
  • Image hosting: We will be creating some method of image hosting, which we will design based on your feedback. It will likely be a paid user feature, because it will cost us both for disk space to store the images and bandwidth to serve them.


We will also be working to create better features for paid communities, under the same theories: anything that costs us money to offer, anything that puts a strain on our servers, and some things that are just plain nifty will be reserved for paid communities, while anything that significantly enhances the community experience and doesn't cost us much to offer will be available for all communities.
tea: Barbara Gordon/Oracle, pushing her hair back. (Default)

[personal profile] tea 2009-04-11 06:40 am (UTC)(link)
Can I just say, I am phenomenally excited for being able to draft posts? Especially when posting fic, with formatting and sometimes last-minute changes, getting stuck having to leave it and maybe lose it is just so furstrating. Plus, I often find I think of an interesting post, but don't ever post it because I know I don't have time to finish it then.

Actually, everything in the "to be added" section is fabulous and useful. Bookmarks! PDF exporting! Scheduled posts!

(no subject)

[personal profile] boji - 2009-04-18 04:34 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] cnidarian - 2009-05-05 12:27 (UTC) - Expand
afuna: Cat under a blanket. Text: "Cats are just little people with Fur and Fangs" (Default)

[personal profile] afuna 2009-04-11 07:04 am (UTC)(link)
I've told you this in IRC, but I have to say it again:

I adore this entry for making so transparent the reasons behind why certain features are paid (even if it's just to admit that it's nifty. Especially because?)

And I'm really looking forward to the completion of some of these projects, even if I have to code them myself *G*
flourish: (Default)

[personal profile] flourish 2009-04-11 02:39 pm (UTC)(link)
IAWTC. It's really nice to have transparency from the get-go.
morineko: Hikaru Amano from Nadesico (Default)

[personal profile] morineko 2009-04-11 07:29 am (UTC)(link)
GO GO SCHEDULED POSTS (and drafts)

I was just going to post on my journal wondering about it, because that is my favorite feature of WordPress, and having it here will just be the greatest thing ever.

[personal profile] rho 2009-04-11 07:35 am (UTC)(link)
Psst. Feeds. Remove the word "syndication" from my presence, vile wench!

(PS <3)
copracat: xena (xena)

[personal profile] copracat 2009-04-11 10:46 am (UTC)(link)
My grabby hands are getting cramps!
abyssinia: Aeryn looking into the distance, words "be more" (Farscape - Aeryn can be more)

[personal profile] abyssinia 2009-04-11 02:27 pm (UTC)(link)
Scheduled posts is BRILLIANT! (and the pdf and expand all but SCHEDULED POSTS YAY!)
inkstone: small blue flowers resting on a wooden board (Default)

[personal profile] inkstone 2009-04-11 02:38 pm (UTC)(link)
I am so incredibly excited about the ability to draft and schedule posts, you don't even understand. That was my #1 favorite thing about WordPress.
oriolegirl: (Default)

[personal profile] oriolegirl 2009-04-11 02:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Question about scheduled posts: will that apply to posting in personal journals only or will it apply to comms as well? I ask because over at LJ I co-mod a writing comm and every day we make an entry for folks to post their daily activity. Usually it's an easy thing to deal with, but occasionally both of us modly folk are out of town and it can get tricky if Internet access is an issue. Scheduled posting would rock for those times.
oriolegirl: (Default)

[personal profile] oriolegirl 2009-04-11 02:43 pm (UTC)(link)
Oh, now that I've read it more closely, I can see that it's paid users. But this would totally rock for comms, too, so... *g*

(no subject)

[personal profile] oriolegirl - 2009-04-11 14:52 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] rho - 2009-04-11 15:16 (UTC) - Expand
turlough: purple crocuses ((mcr art) squeee!)

[personal profile] turlough 2009-04-11 03:19 pm (UTC)(link)
Scheduled posts *makes grabby hands*

Image hosting *makes even more grabby hands*
pensnest: bright-eyed baby me (Default)

[personal profile] pensnest 2009-04-11 04:23 pm (UTC)(link)
I love the scheduled posts idea. My 'regulars' need never be late again! And it's really fascinating to see what you are doing and *why*.
cesy: "Cesy" - An old-fashioned quill and ink (Default)

[personal profile] cesy 2009-04-11 04:53 pm (UTC)(link)
Thank you for being so open about all of this and the reasoning behind it.
smilingslightly: Both listers leaning toward and smiling at the camera. Text reads Too Right. (two_listers)

[personal profile] smilingslightly 2009-04-11 06:23 pm (UTC)(link)
Wow, this is so cool, all the stuff you've got planned. I've never been upset about not being able to have a paid account on LJ, but here... well, it's definitely going on my wishlist. :D

Just wanted to say that All users can go to the syndication page and create feed accounts is very much appreciated. There've been so many times on LJ when I haven't been able to correct* a feed that no longer works after a site's overhaul or add a terrific new feed I've stumbled across that I think people will enjoy.

Do you know if you'll have the same size restrictions on feeds? Frex, tor.com can't be read via LJ because 99% of their posts are "too big". (I'm still fumbling a bit about where feedback about various current and planned features should go, so please your pardon if this ain't the place.)

Add me to the list of people who are very much psyched about Dreamwidth's efforts toward transparency and inclusiveness. Thank you!

* Where "correct" stands for 'making a new syn account for the new feed and then letting subscribers of the no-longer-working one know about it.'

(no subject)

[personal profile] smilingslightly - 2009-04-12 05:11 (UTC) - Expand
ext_25546: (Default)

[identity profile] nekojita.livejournal.com 2009-04-12 10:16 pm (UTC)(link)
I really like how I'd be getting a heck of a lot more for my paid account than more icons to upload. The pricing looks reasonable and the options great.
rainbow: (Default)

[personal profile] rainbow 2009-04-14 04:03 am (UTC)(link)
Woooo!

(Although I keep "hearing" Ivorygates saying, "We will call them entries, by god!" ... and then I try to cross out your "syndicated". I suspect I need sleeeeeee zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz Huh?)
spikewriter: (Default)

[personal profile] spikewriter 2009-04-14 05:05 am (UTC)(link)
Scheduled posts! Oh, that would be wonderful for thing such as birthdays and holiday greetings.

(Is it the 30th yet?)
dreamweaver: Reduced to a puddle of happy noises. Light blue letters on a dark blue background (A puddle of happy noises)

[personal profile] dreamweaver 2009-04-14 05:13 am (UTC)(link)
Sounds fantabulous! I love the bookmarks, and the save as a PDF file thing!
denelian: (Default)

yay! take my money *NOW*!

[personal profile] denelian 2009-04-14 05:22 am (UTC)(link)
i am very random, i know.
i never got a paid LJ; by the time i was doing LJ for reals (as opposed to just occasionally looking at someone) they had started the advertising, and it annoyed me.

i can only picture myself doing the PDF and 'expand all' things (although it's totally possible i am wrong, lol, i may fall totally in love with something i never used on LJ or that is new)
that said, i am going to pay for an account for two (no, three) reasons.

1) i really like your transparency, your operating model, and your name (see? random)
2) i *never* win *anything*. i was already champing at the bit waiting for the release date, when an LJ friend (to whom i gave my one invite code, to pay her back for this favor) mentioned you were doing the OpenID signups - and then i won a closedBeta code! how freaking cool is that, for a girl who *never* wins *anything*
3) i really really really like that you have a mentoring program of sorts going on :) one of my problems with LJ is that it COULD have been a good feminist space, but never quite got there for various reasons. you seem to be starting from the premise, and that makes me happy (please don't make me cry later! haha)

hurry up and open the pay center!
i am also going to buy my guy one, trying to woo him back to from FaceBook :D

Re: yay! take my money *NOW*!

[personal profile] denelian - 2009-04-14 06:00 (UTC) - Expand
vampwillow: (Default)

[personal profile] vampwillow 2009-04-14 11:52 am (UTC)(link)
A sort-of sidebar comment on keeping paid accounts, is that LJ got too money-grabbing for my taste and didn't "sell the sizzle not the sausage" as the saying goes. I'd been a paid-up member for many years until just recently and, thoughout the period leading up to the termination of the paid account* they sent many emails asking (may demanding!) that I stay as paid with the text basically being "here are the methods you can use to pay us". Not once did they actually list what I would lose by not being paid status, nor even provide a link to an account comparison page, which - once I actually found out some things I hadn't realised were part of the paid status stuff would likely have got cash out of me to stay at paid status. Once I was a 'free' account though and had lost these I wasn't inclined to restart those options, so muy money has stayed lost from them,


* which means money for DW, obviously!

(no subject)

[personal profile] vampwillow - 2009-04-14 12:03 (UTC) - Expand
ext_39461: (Default)

[identity profile] renne.somethingdark.net 2009-04-14 12:08 pm (UTC)(link)
Regarding the possibility for extra icons, is this for all levels of accounts, or just paid ones?

(no subject)

[identity profile] renne.somethingdark.net - 2009-04-14 12:14 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[identity profile] renne.somethingdark.net - 2009-04-14 12:40 (UTC) - Expand

[identity profile] getaway-machine.livejournal.com 2009-04-14 12:40 pm (UTC)(link)
I have to admit, I am super excited! Lately on livejournal it's been like 'blegh, why did I buy a permanent account again?' but here, I can't wait to start buying a paid account. :)

But then, I can't wait for the open beta, period!

I agree with everyone else about loving how up-front and clear you guys are being with all your information. You make it make so much sense, and I appreciate that tons.
ext_3176: (Default)

[identity profile] ldybastet.livejournal.com 2009-04-14 08:01 pm (UTC)(link)
This sounds super good! :) Apart from icons, expanding comments, and the file hosting, there's not really that many of the paid-only features I've been using on LJ. Things like scheduled posts, draft posts, and the export to pdf-file makes me so much more excited than a ridiculously high amount of phone posts with no number I could actually use ever did. ;) Not that that is hard... but I think you know what I mean. DreamWidth sounds a lot more useful! Even the nifty extras will actually be useful! :)
elizabeth_rice: Snoopy typing on his typewriter (Default)

[personal profile] elizabeth_rice 2009-04-15 01:22 pm (UTC)(link)
Regarding custom mood themes, uh, I don't know how to frame the question... ok.

How you have distributed icon space - 6 for free account holders, more for paid and premium account holders (I don't know the limits), is it possible to do something similar for custom mood themes?

Eg, 1 or 2 or 3 or however many custom mood themes for free users and more for paid and premium users.

(no subject)

[personal profile] elizabeth_rice - 2009-04-15 15:38 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] triadruid - 2009-05-01 21:35 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] valiha - 2009-05-19 04:40 (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

[personal profile] elizabeth_rice - 2009-07-12 08:54 (UTC) - Expand
xtricks: color snail picture w/ xtricks (Default)

Net neutrality anyone?

[personal profile] xtricks 2009-04-17 04:39 am (UTC)(link)
Uh. I'm actually kind of uncomfortable with this:

Fast Lane: When the site gets overloaded, it can be slow for everyone. We're putting in a function that will let paid users' requests "jump the queue", and be processed before free users' requests. Our goal is to make the site fast for everyone, but when we're having high traffic, that way paid users get to go to the head of the line.

On a world-wide level, the idea of ranking someone's speed or server access based on payment is reviled by every organization I respect and various thoughtful internet freedom organizations are struggling with getting 'net neutrality' put into law.

This really separates the haves from the have nots or have-lesses.

As a private company and not the 'net, the impact certianly isn't the same at all but the concept is uncomfortably similar - at least as I'm understanding your paragraph up there.
Edited 2009-04-17 04:39 (UTC)

Re: Net neutrality anyone?

[personal profile] xtricks - 2009-04-17 16:40 (UTC) - Expand

excited

[personal profile] alessiana 2009-04-20 07:44 pm (UTC)(link)
I'm very excited about this, particularly the save to PDF feature. That is priceless. I lost many dozens of creative posts on a blog site. To have been able to save to PDF would have meant so much.

.
girlguidejones: (Default)

[personal profile] girlguidejones 2009-04-21 12:01 am (UTC)(link)
I *love* the scheduled post feature. As a fic-comm compiler at LJ, there've been many times I've had to get ppl to cover my edition because I wasn't going to be around a computer on my scheduled posting day. This feature would fix that completely! Awesome!


Page 1 of 2